is being mysterious and not at the moment enlightening our particular corner of darkness.
We asked before: What is engaged poetry?
Is it (1) a way of writing stamped by awareness of creating one’s own meaning and values, refusing convention, choosing and deciding minute by minute, living in doubt, regarding nothing as ever settled?
Or is engaged poetry (2) political advocacy – soap-boxing for the rights of one or another of a range of oppressed social groups?
(Sidebar question: May we legitimately consider humanity an “oppressed social group”? Is us against the gods existentially the same as us-human-Group-A against them-human-Group-B?)
Question: Is there a difference between (1) and (2)?
Yes. The first, necessarily, is an existentially creative mode, and a solitary mode (Sidebar question: Which mode of those two comes first?).
The second is a solidarity-based mode, and therefore more likely to be (but not necessarily?) existentially imitative.
The only thing I will point out to all whose heads are exploding at this point is that Scavella started it. Heh.